Check out the Latest Articles:
Flexible Zen Living

For those of you with a specific interest in one or more of the topics that make up the Zen Life-Flexibility Program, but wanting a more ala carte approach, we've created the Flexible Zen Living page - we've taken the videos and merged them by topic, which you can purchase individually: learn meditation, Qi Gong, Breathwork, Yoga, Zen Living, etc.

Magical Thinking


Our new Mem­ber­ship Site is com­ing along!
I’ll be giv­ing you a taste soon — 56 days of video on how to live life
with free­dom and Zen focus!

We’ve received con­fir­ma­tion that we are con­tin­u­ing our Injured Worker’s Project.
We’ll be start­ing a new group soon.


Start­ing to work, again, on a Rela­tion­ships Book. PLEASE, if you have ideas, or ques­tions you’d like to see answered, drop me a line!!!


nailing

Mag­i­cal Think­ing and Carpenters


If — Rud­yard Kipling

If you can keep your head when all about you
Are los­ing theirs and blam­ing it on you,
If you can trust your­self when all men doubt you,
But make allowance for their doubt­ing too;
If you can wait and not be tired by wait­ing,
Or being lied about, don’t deal in lies,
Or being hated, don’t give way to hat­ing,
And yet don’t look too good, nor talk too wise:
If you can dream — and not make dreams your mas­ter;
If you can think — and not make thoughts your aim;
If you can meet with Tri­umph and Dis­as­ter
And treat those two impos­tors just the same;
If you can bear to hear the truth you’ve spo­ken
Twisted by knaves to make a trap for fools,
Or watch the things you gave your life to bro­ken,
And stoop and build ‘em up with wornout tools:
If you can make one heap of all your win­nings
And risk it on one turn of pitch-and-toss,
And lose, and start again at your begin­nings
And never breathe a word about your loss;
If you can force your heart and nerve and sinew
To serve your turn long after they are gone,
And so hold on when there is noth­ing in you
Except the Will which says to them: ‘Hold on!‘
If you can talk with crowds and keep your virtue,
Or walk with kings — nor lose the com­mon touch,
If nei­ther foes nor lov­ing friends can hurt you,
If all men count with you, but none too much;
If you can fill the unfor­giv­ing minute
With sixty sec­onds’ worth of dis­tance run -
Yours is the Earth and every­thing that’s in it,
And — which is more — you’ll be a Man my son!.

My buddy Ray Thaw sent me a copy of “If,” by Rud­yard Kipling. His ques­tion: “How’s that for balance?”

I hadn’t read this poem in decades, and I was glad to re-acquaint myself with it. It cer­tainly fits with our present theme. I want to go back to my orig­i­nal anal­ogy of the enlight­ened life being like the flow of a river between the banks of two extremes. They are chaos and rigid­ity. We could call them any­thing. In the poem, we see the Mid­dle Way expressed, in how the per­son lives in the face of challenge.

Exam­ple: “If you can meet with Tri­umph and Dis­as­ter
And treat those two impos­tors just the same;”

Our ten­dency is to think, as we work our way along, that wis­dom leads to no problems.

This in fact is the key “sell­ing point” for New Age ideas like “The Secret,” and other books and movies that preach “what you think you cre­ate.” The idea is that the cos­mos is a sys­tem that is like a gum ball machine. Put in the right coinage (pos­i­tive, directed thoughts) and out pops what you paid for.

Except the real world isn’t like that.

The idea is that the cos­mos is a sys­tem that is like a gum ball machine.

The plot of the poem more clearly cap­tures real­ity. This is obvi­ously the descrip­tion of some­one fairly far down the path, and what we see are exam­ples (dis­as­ter, loss, dis­re­spect, etc.) of “the shit hit­ting the fan.”

Also, there are exam­ples of “adoration.”

And the wise soul nav­i­gates between these two banks by sim­ply being with what­ever hap­pens. There is no expec­ta­tion that “stuff” will not hap­pen. There is increased skill in deal­ing with it when it does.

I once worked with a client who came in with the self-identified need “to get her affir­ma­tions fixed.” No, really. Those were her words. Her life was not going “right,” and she knew that if only she worded her requests to the cos­mos cor­rectly, every­thing would be perfect.

magicWhen you wish upon a star…

Her hus­band was hav­ing a stu­dio built for her, and she had the hots for the car­pen­ter. She and he had pro­gressed to touch­ing, and to pro­fes­sions of admi­ra­tion, and had even decided that they were “soul mates.” (Hint: no such thing, so stop look­ing!)

He and she talked daily (while he “ham­mered”…) about the spir­i­tual neces­sity of them “join­ing their ener­gies together for the ben­e­fit of all.” No, really.

I laughed, and said, “So, bonk him. What’s the prob­lem? And kill the flow­ery language.”

She: “You don’t under­stand. This is a deeply spir­i­tual mat­ter. He is mar­ried and so am I. I am try­ing to word my affir­ma­tion so that our spouses will real­ize, with­out out telling them, that our join­ing together will ben­e­fit every­one. I want every­one to approve, and be happy for us! Is that too much to ask?”

Me: “Um… hmm… Well, the odds of your part­ners get­ting on the band­wagon isn’t high, unless you’ve talked about this and come to an agree­ment about hav­ing sex with oth­ers. The odds are they won’t like it, or might even decide to leave. That would be a consequence.”

She: “If I get my affir­ma­tions right, there will be no consequences!!”

This went on for a few ses­sions, until she real­ized that I wasn’t going to be able to “fix her hus­band by remote con­trol affir­ma­tion.” She left to look for some­one more competent.

Now, I have no prob­lem with her want­ing to bonk the carpenter.

She may even decide to actu­ally do it, as opposed to fan­ta­size about it. The prob­lem is in her assump­tion that “enlight­ened peo­ple” (and she assured me that she was one...) don’t have such dif­fi­cul­ties. They are so wise and won­der­ful that all there is are roses and adoration.

The poem above puts pause to that notion.

Wis­dom is this: life con­tin­ues to hap­pen, no mat­ter what we do, what we learn, or who we are. At the very least, we are march­ing along to the final des­ti­na­tion for us all — death. Every sin­gle one of us is going to get older, to get sick, infirm, and die. All the wis­dom in the world can’t stop this.

And then, life has a habit of being real, and part of real­ity is that things will hap­pen that we’d rather didn’t. This is inevitable. The wise per­son has no illu­sions about this. What they do have are the ways and means to deal with the drama. And that way is to deal with what is, as opposed to whin­ing about what isn’t.

To quote : If nei­ther foes nor lov­ing friends can hurt you,
If all count with you, but none too much;

This, again, is the key to bal­ance.

stone

We end­lessly say that what hap­pens inside of you is “all you, all the time.” Oth­ers don’t hurt you or make you happy. (The only way another can hurt you is if they do it physically.)

Words do not hurt - your inter­pre­ta­tion of the words is what causes you pain.

What is really being said here is that we need to be aware of oth­ers, and sen­si­tive to oth­ers (the Bud­dha would use the word “com­pas­sion­ate.”) This does not, emphat­i­cally, mean doing what oth­ers want you to. It doesn’t mean end­lessly putting oth­ers first. it means being aware of oth­ers, and not being a jerk. It means being hon­est and open, and reveal­ing of who you are and what’s up for you.

Oth­ers count, just not too much. The Mid­dle Way.

In the end, it’s impos­si­ble to be much use if you are con­stantly look­ing to oth­ers for praise, for admi­ra­tion, or for direc­tion. That’s your job. It’s your job to be per­sis­tent in your talk­ing, learn­ing, and shar­ing, while remem­ber­ing that oth­ers are “right there.” The more we work at this, the more oth­ers might choose to offend them­selves. Our job is to know, expect, and except this—to be com­pas­sion­ate, and to keep walking.

Our work with this blog is to offer you an alter­na­tive view, and to help you to drop mag­i­cal think­ing, while encour­ag­ing you to keep going. Part of the walk is sim­ple accep­tance of “what is.”

Next week, we’ll look at this from a Taoist perspective.


Make Con­tact!

So, how does this week’s arti­cle sit with you? What ques­tions do you have? Go to the top of this arti­cle, click on the title, and leave a com­ment or question!


Work­shops, Retreats!

Dar­bella and I can help you to find a new, vibrant, rich path. We offer day-long and week­end events —just you and us—and we will work with you, to be the change you want to see.

Read about it here:

Day-long Inten­sives
Week­end Residentials


Incom­ing search terms:

Related posts:

  1. Ponzi Schemes and Mag­i­cal Thinking
  2. Mag­i­cal Blues
  3. Putting Your Soul into your Being
  4. Form is empti­ness, empti­ness is form
  5. Caught Tail


Tagged with:



  1. […] This post was men­tioned on Twit­ter by Wayne Allen. Wayne Allen said: A new post! Mag­i­cal Think­ing — Our new Mem­ber­ship Site is com­ing along! I’ll be giv­ing you a taste soon 56 days o… http://ow.ly/17p0PF […]

  2. Isabelle (Reply) on Monday 17, 2010

    I’m always amazed how each of your weekly blogs apply to every lit­tle bits I’m liv­ing at the moment. It’s like the brain/heart/body can only takes so much at the time and your weekly blogs act as advice/reminders once a week so we keep apply­ing new ideas to our reg­u­lar rou­tine. Change is awe­some, I’m lov­ing every part of it.
    Thanks Wayne!
    Isabelle

    • wayne (Reply) on Monday 17, 2010

      Hi Isabelle,
      Thanks for the com­ment. I’ve always loved Lao Tsu’s com­ment that the jour­ney of a 100 miles begins with the first step. This is so for all of us–learning, apply­ing, check­ing results. Wash, rinse, repeat.
      I’m glad you’re along for the walk!

  3. Ray (Reply) on Monday 17, 2010

    Nice ending…I would hope that Rudy won’t mind the changes. To my mind, it brings a mod­ern day rel­e­vance to it; not that there’s any­thing wrong with the original…ha ha…
    R

  4. Peter Hoban (Reply) on Monday 17, 2010

    Hi Wayne

    I despair. This polit­i­cally cor­rect bas­tardi­s­a­tion of Kipling’s poem destroys the orig­i­nal, and to what end? Surely the exer­cise of insight and integrity in our lives also allows us to enjoy lit­er­a­ture with­out hav­ing to bend the knee to such empty-headed ideology.

    I guess that’s just the way it is.

    Kind regards just the same. Peter

    • wayne (Reply) on Monday 17, 2010

      Hey Peter,
      Point taken! Being the “non-politically-correct” type most of the time, I decided to switch the poem back to it’s orig­i­nal lan­guage and “gender.”

      Warmly, Wayne

  5. Ray (Reply) on Monday 17, 2010

    I won­der if (ha, ha), taken the time period of the writ­ing, Rudy writ­ten in the fem­ine, or nue­tral, there’d still be the pop­u­lar­ity and longevity? I must admit to not being com­fort­able chang­ing such a great work, it was done on a whim to see if the mean­ing (my inter­pre­ta­tion) would be altered or enhanced…shot it to Wayne for dis­cus­sion purposes…sorry if any took offence…none was intended…
    R


Read This Before Leaving a Comment

Please make sure your comments follow our guidelines:

  • Use your real name, not keywords
  • No signature links in your comments
  • Comments should add to the discussion

Comments that do not adhere will be deleted or marked as SPAM.

 

Switch to our mobile site

Switch to our mobile site